![]() Improved interoperability also means you don’t have to choose sides. (Ask the engineers on contests like Robot Wars.) Let’s bring on the fighting words – after all, a little friendly competition drives better tools. Given the coincidence of Sibelius and MuseScore getting their upgrades at the same time, I asked the MuseScore developers directly how they thought they compared. ![]() It’s been translated into some 43 languages and counts more than 2500 downloads daily. You won’t find a big orchestral sample library as in Sibelius 7 and Finale’s Garritan-based sounds, but there’s still support for soft synth playback, and you can run for free on Mac, Windows, and Linux. You can enter music with keyboard, mouse, or MIDI, use the usual complement of symbols and layout features, and import and export both MusicXML and Standard MIDI files. There’s an iPad-based score reader, which in turn is a revenue source (no reason open source software can’t generate income). MuseScore has a robust notation engine, capable feature set, and it’s even catching on in a number of academic institutions around the world. MuseScore will look more familiar to users of something like Sibelius, and just as the latter released a major upgrade, it also had a big 1.1 release with major new enhancements. I’ve spoken previously about engraving tool Lilypond, but it’s not entirely graphical, even with GUI front ends. But not only are there other alternatives, too, here’s one tool that’s making free and open source notation viable. Music notation software has long been seen as a two-horse race, a Pepsi versus Coke stand-off between Finale and Sibelius. An example score produced with MuseScore’s new lead sheet features.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |